"Before Breakfast" By Eugene O'neill Essay
Before Breakfast is a short gloomy play by Eugene O'Neill. Eugene O'Neill was born in 1888 in New York City. He is the only American dramatist to ever win the Nobel Prize for literature. Before Breakfast is set in the Greenwich Village section of New York City, in a small one room flat on Christopher Street. The flat consists of a kitchen and dinning area. There are only two characters in this drama. Mrs. Roland who is the only speaking character and her husband Alfred. Alfred's hand is seen once in the play, but not much else. This is symbolic of an absentee husband or a non-existent marriage. Although, Alfred is not seen, he contributes a great deal to the conflict. With only Mrs. Rowland on stage, O'Neill allows the plot to revolve around her.
This drama portrays that aspirations and dreams are dashed by hardships and cold reality. A couple entangled in a lengthy struggle, destined to end in tragedy. The conflict begins long before we meet Mr. And Mrs. Rowland. The couple was married when Mrs. Rowland became pregnant at a young age. Alfred's father tried to buy the young mother off. Family and friends disapproved of the young girl, because of her social status. The child, the reason the couple married, born dead. Alfred unable to sell his writings, is depressed. His depression contributes to a self destructive lifestyle, dragging his wife along with him. It was inevitable the marriage would fail.
Mrs. Rowland, the protagonist, is portrayed as the stereotypical nagging wife. While a flat character, she is very realistic. Her level of diction implies her lack of education, she is also bitter towards her husband. Her bitterness is not unfounded. Alfred is of no help, "Heaven knows I do my part-and more-going out sewing every day while you play the gentleman and loaf around bar rooms with that good-for-nothing lot of artists from the Square" (Jacobs 1211). Mrs. Rowland's husband is adulterous and can not hold down a job. Mrs. Rowland loves her husband, although she does not like the way he treats her. She exhibited...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%
The Life Of Eugene O'neill. Loosely Based Off Long Day's Journey Into Night.2852 words - 11 pages After reading the play "Long Day's Journey into Night" I began to question it. What am I reading? What is this play about? Who is Eugene O'Neill? After researching his life, as well as the...
Discuss the life of Eugene O' Neil and how he has impacted American History.1373 words - 5 pages Eugene O' Neill was born in New York City on October 16, 1888 to an Irish-Catholic theatrical family. (Beyond Mourning) He would later become one of the greatest playwrights in American history. Through his work, he addressed the difficulties of American society with great complexity.Eugene was the son of Ella Quilan O'Neill (usually called Ella) and James O'...
Orestes in Modern Drama: "Mourning Becomes Electra"2328 words - 9 pages "I'm always acutely aware of the Force behind - (Fate,God, our biological past creating our present, whatever onecalls it - Mystery certainly) - and the eternal tragedy of Manin his glorious, self-destructive struggle to make the Forceexpress him instead of being, as an animal is, an incidentin its expression. . . . This is the only subject worth writingabout and . . . it is possible - or can be - to...
'Evolution or Revolution' - Recurring ideas in Ibsen, O'Neill and Shepard3909 words - 16 pages Evolution or Revolution? Recurring themes, ideas and conventions in the dramas of Ibsen, O'Neill and Shepard. Throughout the history of drama, playwrights have appropriated the ideas of their predecessors for their own use, sometimes building on them and making the idea their own. American drama is no exception. American drama has its roots firmly entrenched in modern European drama, this is illustrated through the influence of Norwegian...
Denial in The Iceman Cometh2237 words - 9 pages Denial in The Iceman Cometh Denial is the refusal to admit the truth. It is the refusal to accept or acknowledge the reality or validity of a thing or idea. Many characters in The Iceman Cometh suffer from denial and false hope. O'Neill places these characters in the appropriate setting in which they are able to fantasize about their dreams. Amidst the drunken and misguided characters, O'Neill presents a few that the...
Analysis of Eugene O'Neill's Long Day’s Journey into Night1497 words - 6 pages In the early 20th century, America was moving up socially and economically because of the advancing technology. The standard of living was vastly improving, and people lived a much better condition; however, women were still trapped in the world of patriarchy during this time period. Patriarchy is a social system that “privileges men by promoting traditional gender roles” which casts men as “rational, strong, protective, and decisive” while woman...
"Long Days Journey Into Night" by Eugene O'Niel The effects of Tyrone's actions on the rest of his family.617 words - 2 pages The best way is to live life is in moderation or as a Buddhist would say, taking the "middle path". Often times it is good to save your money and not be a spendthrift but if you are too cheap then you can cause even more troubles for you and those around you. In Eugene O'Neil's play write
Incest In "Mourning Becomes Electra"1302 words - 5 pages Eugene O'Neill, an American play writer, is the author of Mourning becomes Electra, one of the most controversial plays in American history. O'Neill had been happily married at one time, but his marriage fell apart and it ended in divorce. During this time, O'Neill became enthralled with the psychoanalytical view on life, which continued to haunt him for most of his life. After the divorce, O'Neill remarried, but was still fascinated with...
The Ending to Eugene O'Neil's Long Day's Journey Into Night1232 words - 5 pages The Ending to Eugene O'Neil's Long Day's Journey Into Night It is understandable that so many people in our class did not find the last act of Eugene O'Neill's Long Day's Journey Into Night a satisfying one; there is no tidy ending, no goodbye kisses or murder confessions; none of the charaters leave the stage with flowers in their hands or with smiles on their faces and none of the characters give explanatory monologues after the curtain...
Biography of Eugene O'Neil2463 words - 10 pages Biography of Eugene O'Neil Eugene O'neill Through poverty and fame, "An artist or nothing"(Miller p6), was the motto of a man named Eugene O'Neill, who wrote from his soul in an attempt to find salvation. In the year 1888, the Barrett House hotel in Time Square, New York saw the birth of a man who would be called the greatest American playwright. His father James, was an actor, and was famous across the United Sates for his role in the popular...
Breakfast - The Most Important Meal of the Day1227 words - 5 pages Breakfast represents the most important meal of the day. I chose this topic because I often forget to eat breakfast and I want to know why this is not a good practice. I already know that by eating breakfast I save myself from over indulgence later in the day. Breakfast is considered brain food because it gets me going in the morning. This information came to me from parents and previous teachers that tried to inform me that eating breakfast...
Like William Shakespeare, O’Neill was a man of the theater: He was born into it, grew up in it, worked in it, and wrote for it. He knew his craft, and he hated the artificiality and pretense of the commercial theater. He said, “The theatre to me is life—the substance and interpretation of life. . . . [And] life is struggle, often, if not usually, unsuccessful struggle.” O’Neill was an artist of integrity and courage; he was constantly exploring, expanding, experimenting. He tended toward realism in his work, rejecting material that could not be verified by the senses.
At times, however, he played with nonrealistic, expressionistic devices, externalizing the interior state of a character with sound or light or language: the throbbing tom-toms in The Emperor Jones (1920), to signify Jones’s increasing hysteria; the masks in The Great God Brown (1926), to portray the multifaceted nature of the characters; the foghorn in Long Day’s Journey into Night, to parallel Mary’s increasing confusion. At other times, his characters seem to have sprung from a Darwinian naturalism, helpless in the grip of forces beyond their control.
O’Neill also experimented with content and structure. When Eugene, Jr., became a classical scholar, the playwright sought to share these interests and grew fascinated by the powerful material of Greek tragedy: incest, infanticide, matricide, and the accompanying burden of guilt and atonement. He shared the Greeks’ view of the individual in conflict with the universe and with whatever God or gods inhabit it, and he was further concerned with the dearth of tragedy in the modern theater. Desire Under the Elms (1924), which includes infanticide, and Mourning Becomes Electra, which derives from Aeschylus’s Oresteia (fifth century b.c.e.), were efforts to create modern tragedies exploring the agonies suffered by those who behave against law and conscience.
The structure varies from play to play. O’Neill could use a traditional brief one-act structure, as in the early sea plays, but both The Hairy Ape (1922) and The Emperor Jones are long one-acts with a number of scenes. Desire Under the Elms is a traditional-length three-act play, but Strange Interlude is a very long play in two parts with fourteen scenes and a break for dinner. Mourning Becomes Electra is perhaps the longest, essentially consisting of three full-length plays, with a total of thirteen acts. The Iceman Cometh and Long Day’s Journey into Night, with four acts each, run between four and five hours in the theater. At times both audiences and critics complained, but O’Neill insisted that the length was appropriate and necessary for his ideas.
Even at his most experimental, there is an unerring psychological validity to his characters. The ideas of Freudian psychoanalysis were contemporary throughout O’Neill’s career, and the power of the unconscious suited his characters well. They may openly express a longing for the sea or for a farm or for a place in the universe, but the conflict with the father or the longing for love from the mother rages not far below the surface. Working from his own unconscious, O’Neill created plays that were disguised attempts to work through his personal conflicts with his mother, father, and brother, and with his own quest for identity. Travis Bogard claims that “the sum of his work comprises an autobiography.”
Although O’Neill’s view of humanity was despairing and nearly tragic, there are no moral messages in his plays. He does not preach or promote causes. There are few villains in his works; instead there are characters of enormous energy, driven by huge passions—lust, greed, ambition, and love. A major thematic concern with O’Neill is obsessive love, love that drives a person without reason and beyond conscience, love that does not heal but smothers and destroys. Although Christine and Lavinia Mannon in Mourning Becomes Electra are prime examples of this obsession, characters in Beyond the Horizon, The Great God Brown, Desire Under the Elms, and Strange Interlude are also consumed by their passions.
O’Neill explored the notion that there are many facets of personality and that people rarely reveal themselves unmasked to others—or even to themselves. When they do, they discover that others are presenting only masks in return, a response that can be disappointing and even frightening. While Shakespeare could use asides and soliloquies, O’Neill sought other methods to reveal the psyche. In The Great God Brown, he uses actual masks, which actors don and remove; in Strange Interlude, he uses interior monologues. Somewhat controversial, these theatrical devices underscore the theme of the evasive nature of humanity.
A corollary theme concerns the need for illusion. O’Neill states that human beings often behave from a network of illusions that they have created about themselves and about others. In Anna Christie, Chris Christopherson believes that he hates “dat ole davil, sea”; his daughter Anna insists that all men are worthless. These illusions are shattered by events in the play and replaced by a better reality.
In The Iceman Cometh, written twenty years later, O’Neill draws characters surviving upon their “pipe dreams”: They believe that they will leave Harry Hope’s saloon in the near future and lead productive lives. When they are forced to face their illusions, they seek death.
As might be expected, O’Neill is not universally admired. His principal detractors find his style crude, his language clumsy, and his plays in need of editing. Concerning style, one must remember that O’Neill was blazing a path separate from the contrivances of the romantic “well-made play.” Aside from the early The Hairy Ape, there are few overheard or misinterpreted conversations and few traditional happy endings with all threads resolved. As for language, on the printed page the dialogue may look stilted and unbelievable, but in the mouths of talented stage professionals, it rings true. Finally, as with the works of Shakespeare, judicious editing may be desirable, but the powerful experience provided by the plays in performance is undeniable.
The Emperor Jones
First produced: 1920 (first published, 1921)
Type of work: Play
A greedy, materialistic ruler is stripped of his pretensions and pursued to his death.
The Emperor Jones, which ran for 204 performances at the Provincetown Playhouse in Greenwich Village, represented the first major success by a black actor on the American stage; it also made O’Neill famous.
Almost medieval in structure, this long one-act play in eight scenes details the fall from power of a corrupt ruler, former Pullman porter Brutus Jones, who has made himself emperor of a West Indian island and greedily exploited the natives. As the play opens, the populace has revolted, and Jones realizes he must flee. In his egocentricity, he believes that the legend he has created—that he can be killed only with a silver bullet—will protect him and that his planned escape route through the forest will take him to a waiting ship and safety with the riches intact that he has extorted from the people.
As Jones travels through the forest, he is stripped physically, mentally, and emotionally of the trappings of civilization and forced back through his racial memory to a tribal past, where, naked and hysterical before the Crocodile God, he uses his silver bullet to reject the possessive god as the natives approach to kill him, ironically, with their own silver bullets. The play permits several levels of interpretation. Socially, a proud, greedy, corrupt ruler is deposed by the downtrodden people. Psychologically, a person regresses through individual memory to his racial unconscious. Philosophically, a human being fights the inevitable losing battle with the forces of the universe. Theologically, one denies a possessive god and is sacrificed to it.
Equally significant are the expressionistic devices that O’Neill has incorporated. In the middle of the first scene a tom-tom “exactly corresponding to normal pulse beat—72—to the minute—[begins] and continues at a gradually accelerating rate from this point uninterruptedly to the very end of the play.” Realistically, the drumbeats represent the natives communicating with one another as they pursue Jones. On the nonrealistic expressionistic level, they represent Jones’s heartbeats as his anxiety increases and he regresses to a tribal past. When the drums stop, the audience knows that Jones is dead.
Another device is the gradual stripping of clothes, which is both physical and psychological: Jones begins in his emperor’s robes and ends in a tattered loincloth, as he regresses from a civilized to a savage state. Finally, daylight contrasts with moonlight (a device O’Neill also uses in Long Day’s Journey into Night and The Iceman Cometh). Day represents harsh reality, where no illusions can survive; moonlight is illusion. The play begins at 3:30 in the afternoon, when the sun “still blazes yellowly.”
The scenes pass through nightfall into darkness, at nine, eleven, one, three, and five o’clock, ending at dawn, and they parallel Jones’s progress through the increasing darkness of his mind to his death in the bright light of day.
The play prefigures the basic theme of O’Neill’s last plays, which is that one cannot live without illusions. Jones believes that he has manipulated and outwitted the natives’ superstitions for his own ends. His great illusion is that he can deny his illusionary past, his humanity, and his need for a god force stronger than himself.
Desire Under the Elms
First produced: 1924 (first published, 1925)
Type of work: Play
The passionate desires of father, stepmother, and son result in a triangle of tragedy and retribution.
Banned in Boston and England, narrowly escaping a ban in New York, and its Los Angeles cast arrested for obscenity, Desire Under the Elms, with incest, adultery, and infanticide openly treated, brought O’Neill into conflict with various censors and brought much of the public to the box office. It ran for 208 performances on and off Broadway and may be the first important American tragedy.
The play demonstrates O’Neill’s exploration of Greek theater. It does not derive directly from any particular play, but its material echoes Hippolytus and Medea, which contain incest and infanticide. The inhibited, puritanical society of New England in 1850 seemed to O’Neill appropriate for the epic Greek quality he sought. A further debt to the Greeks occurs in the sense of an inevitable fate awaiting the participants, Ephraim Cabot, his son Eben, and Ephraim’s new wife, Abby Putnam.
The desire of Eben and Abby for each other is apparent from the moment she steps into the house, although it is masked by Eben’s antagonism and her caution. He is loyal to the memory of his dead mother, whom he feels was robbed of her land and worked to death by Ephraim. The farm is his, he believes, and Abby is an intruder, seeking to steal his inheritance. She, in turn, has learned to fight for what she wants, and now she seeks security and a place of her own.
If Eben were not there, quite likely Abby would have made a good wife for Ephraim as long as he lived; however, the mutual physical attraction of Abby and Eben cannot be resisted. In a powerful scene in which Abby lures Eben into the parlor and declares her love, promising that she will take the dead mother’s place, “with a horribly frank mixture of lust and mother love,” the adultery is consummated.
One psychoanalytic critic noted that the play seems to have been written by someone in “intense mourning for his mother” (O’Neill had lost both his mother and brother in the previous two years). Certainly the yearning for the nurturing, protective mother permeates the work, not only in Eben’s speeches about his love for his mother and in his incestuous love for the wife of his father, but also in Abby’s speeches about her willingness to substitute for the mother. Further, both Abby and Eben strongly desire the land, which belonged to the mother, and which represents the same nurturing, protective qualities. This motif is further emphasized in O’Neill’s specific directions for the visual effects of the setting, in which he calls for two elm trees on each side of the house with “a sinister maternity . . . like exhausted women resting their sagging breasts and hands and hair on its roof.”
The Oedipal conflict of father and son for superiority, through possession of the woman, underlies the action of the play. Ephraim’s superior maleness will be demonstrated unequivocally with the birth of a son by Abby. Eben’s secret knowledge that Abby’s son is his secures his male superiority as well as his claim to the farm. When Eben becomes jealous of Ephraim’s possessiveness of the baby, Abby, literally accepting his cry that he wishes the baby had never been born, murders the child to prove her love. She readily acknowledges her crime, Eben accepts his responsibility, and both resign themselves to punishment. Ephraim must remain on the farm. “God’s hard,” he says, believing that a force beyond himself has guided events.
The structure of the play is one of O’Neill’s tightest; its three acts are economical and swiftly moving. O’Neill’s innovative set design of the original production made use of a house exterior and interior: When a scene occurred in one room, the exterior wall could be removed, and scenes set in different rooms could be viewed simultaneously. This allowed for an easy flow from one scene to another. The lighting also contributed, providing a contrast between the brightly lit exterior and the dim, shadowy interior.
O’Neill’s use of language is masterful; the Yankee words and phrases such as “Ayeh,” “purty,” and “I love ye, Abby,” and the biblical passages recited by Ephraim, arise naturally but effectively from the characters. The character of Eben is the key to the essence of the play. Of a sensitive nature, like the author himself, the weak, questing son is a figure O’Neill used many times. Here his love of the land, his awareness of its beauty, and his need for love infuse the play with poetry and elevate it above the level of simple realism into poignant tragedy.
The Great God Brown
First produced: 1926 (first published, 1926)
Type of work: Play
The rivalry of the artist in...
(The entire section is 6125 words.)